Comments on: Should we stop supporting users without JavaScript?

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:18:18 +0000

I’m not sure when this was posted (I don’t see an associated date with the post), but if this was posted some time in the last 3 years Jon doesn’t know his [derogatory body part] from his [other derogatory body part]‘s third nipple (figure that one out). Javascript and, in a broader sense, ecmascript is the future of the web and all computing as we know it. 9 years ago, jon would be right. At present he’s is both wrong and extremely out of touch.

By: Natan

Natan — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:57:03 +0000

I think that JavaScript is great! But websites should not be JavaScript dependent at any cost!

By: Codehead

Codehead — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:50:14 +0000

That’s true, just turn off your JavaScript and try logging in to Facebook

By: Joel

Joel — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:43:48 +0000

You are correct. People without javascript already have limited options and it will just continue that way. Many mainstream sites do not support browsers without javascript

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:28:22 +0000

Javascript sucks, it’s nothing but a security risk and something to freeze up my browser. The sooner it’s dead and gone the better, and if your site requires it than no one should ever visit your site again.

By: Codehead

Codehead — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:33:48 +0000

We think exactly the other way around, all future web services are going to require JavaScript.

By: jon

jon — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:26:32 +0000

I think everyone should STOP using javascript. And all browsers should stop supporting it. It’s a piece of s#*@ language that does more harm than good.